Jodie Vanderslot | Health Editor
Featured image: It’s that time of year again. | Courtesy of Wikimedia Commons
It seems that almost every year, we hear “this winter will be worse than the last,” suggesting this flu season, too, will be worse than its predecessor.
Health officials are cautioning patients about a potentially miserable flu season. The happenings in the Southern Hemisphere are good predictors of what’s to come for the North (hopefully not the Lannisters).
This year, those residing in the Southern Hemisphere—specifically in Australia—were affected for months with the notorious flu strain H3N2.
Seasonal flu activity tends to initiate as early as October and November, taking up temporary residency and staying until as late as May. The unwelcome guest H3N2 is much more severe than other strains, especially for those who are over the age of 65, infants, or pregnant. The outbreaks share many similarities to the common flu strain, H1N1—however, they tend to last longer and be more severe, in turn carrying a much higher mortality rate.
There are various flu viruses that circulate every year, with some being more prominent and powerful than others. The vaccine is created based on what research predicts will be the most common virus this season. The flu shot injects a small dose of the virus into your bloodstream, causing antibodies to develop in the body about two weeks after vaccination. These antibodies provide protection against the infection and build up a tolerance and awareness of the virus, making your body able to protect against the indicated influenza strains this season.
This year, three types of influenza are expected to spread: A (H1N1, H3N2), B, and C.
Medical recommendations are that all persons receive the flu shot. Those at high risk of flu-related complications are urged to be vaccinated immediately—the elderly, children under five, pregnant women, those with underlying respiratory or cardiac conditions, and those working with any of the above individuals.
In some workplaces and programs, such as at York’s School of Nursing, it is mandatory that students receive and submit proof of their flu vaccine by a specific date. For those with allergies, the vaccine contains small amounts of formaldehyde and thimerosal, though these doses should not cause any allergic reactions.
Formaldehyde, which helps digest food, is used to deactivate viruses and bacteria that might contaminate the effectiveness of the vaccine. Thimerosal is a preservative used when administering multi-dose vials of the vaccine, which keeps them free from contamination of ethyl mercury.
However, this ingredient is not present in a single, pre-filled syringe, nor a FluMist dose.
All vaccines provided by Ontario are now aluminum-free, and are now safe for those with egg allergies and sensitivities.
If you have experienced a mild reaction due to an egg allergy in the past, having had shown any symptom other than hives, it is still recommended that you receive the vaccine.
You cannot get the flu from this shot. The risks from the injected vaccine are few, including temporary soreness in the arm, and less common symptoms include mild fever and aches.
However, the vaccine should be avoided if you have anaphylactic allergies to these ingredients (except eggs), or have experienced a serious allergic reaction or developed Guillain-Barre Syndrome (a rare illness) from a previous flu shot.
Flu shots are available on campus at Appletree in York Lanes during regular operating hours—however, due to the high volume of patients, wait times are longer, and the clinic will be busier than normal. Due to this increase, registration can close two to three hours before the actual hours of closing time.
Walk-in clinics, as well as most Shopper’s Drug Mart locations, will also administer the dose.
Readers may be interested in the fact that this article exactly follows the vaccine industry directive on how to market flu shots–using fear.
“Medical experts and public health authorities publicly (e.g., via media) state concern and alarm (and predict dire outcomes)– and urge influenza vaccination.”
Check.
“Framing of the flu season in terms that motivate behavior (e.g., as “very severe,” “more severe than last or past years,” “deadly”)
Check.
And yes, we have seen this every year for over a decade. In fact, we’ve seen this since 2004, when the industry directive to fear-monger flu shots first appeared:
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/265184699_Increasing_Awareness_and_Uptake_of_Influenza_Immunization_Increasing_Awareness_and_Uptake_of_Influenza_Immunization
This article fails to report several relevant and important facts.
*FACT* The science fails to show acceptable efficacy in flu shots for healthy adults. In fact, even in years where vaccine strains are well-matched to circulating influenza strains, it would be necessary to vaccinate 71 adults to prevent 1 case of flu. Not one death, ONE CASE.
http://ahrp.org/cochrane-collaboration-flu-vaccines-of-no-benefit/
http://www.cochrane.org/CD001269/ARI_vaccines-to-prevent-influenza-in-healthy-adults
https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/855937
*FACT* The science fails to show acceptable efficacy in flu shots for young children. http://www.cochrane.org/CD004879/ARI_vaccines-preventing-influenza-healthy-children
*FACT* The science fails to show acceptable efficacy in flu shots for the elderly. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/flu-shots-may-not-protect-the-elderly-or-the-very-young/
*FACT* There are MANY severe adverse reactions to vaccines that do not fall into the category of “allergy.” Flu shots have been associated with exacerbating, triggering, and even causing severe autoimmune issues. These severe reactions to flu shots are actually far more common than simple allergic reactions, and can be just as deadly.
https://vaccinelaw.com/lawyer/2016/03/24/Vaccine-Injury/Can-Vaccines-Cause-Auto-Immune-Disorders-–-Providing-Answers-to-Commonly-Asked-Questions_bl24139.htm
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22235050
The package insert for every brand of flu shot includes a list of reported severe adverse “adverse events following immunization.” You can read vaccine package inserts here: http://www.immunize.org/fda/
*FACT* Section 13.1 of EVERY package insert for EVERY brand of flu shot (and every vaccine used in the US) states: “_____ [this vaccine] has not been assessed for carcinogenicty, mutagenicity, or impairment of fertility.”
This means that we have no idea if repeated injections — or even a single injection — can play a casual role in the development of cancer, genetic mutation, or infertility.
See above for link.
So why does a community newspaper urge that everyone get this invasive medical intervention, regardless of genetic predispostion or susceptibility to non-allergy adverse reactions? Shouldn’t a community newspaper represent THE COMMUNITY, rather than a government-backed industry?
Or is it an industry-backed government?
That’s a topic for a different discussion…